Criminal Law Phase 3(db)

Running head : CRIMINAL LAW brutal lawfulness Phase 3NameSchoolProfessorCourse unlawful Law Phase 3 In the abomination jurist dodge , one important task of the motor inn is the decision of the guiltiness of the individual incriminate . Under the validation and Criminal Procedures afford laid down the rights that an impeach should be afforded while the last mentioned states the procedure of prosecuting an accused . In which faux pas , the practice of laws were propounded to protect the rights of the accused . The determination of artlessness should be the core of the br mental test . However , in the wordings of Blackstone where he stated , It is better that ecstasy guilty persons pay off than that one unimpeachable suffer some(a) interpreted that this doctrine causes digression from the established criminal just ice placement (Laudan , 2006 ,.63In my view , the philosophy does not defeat the criminal justice system on two dry lands . one is the legal responsibility of the ball club to protect the innocent . In the Constitution alone , an accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty beyond liable doubt . By the wordings of the law , it is implied that the innocence of an accused is presumed and is necessary to go through a work out of auditory sense and trial before his conviction . The swear out of convicting an accused whence is arduous because livingspan and impropriety is involvedThe atomic number 42 ground is the moral responsibility of the criminal justice system (Whitman , 2008 ,.208 . It is of no doubt that innocent people are protect by law .

On the part of the court , the determination of innocence or guilt is the very core of the pursuit process Acquitting a guilty would be morally unimpeachable than convicting an innocent person . On the part of the innocent person , it would be greatly be unfair to deprive him of life and liberty for any crime he never pull . That would be grossly wasting a worthy life and is unsatisfactory to human conscience . On the other pass well-nigh , setting a lawless life free would not create much guilt as the law will always apply to them no matter how they try to bunk . Furthermore , their conscience will hunt them endlesslyReferencesLaudan , L (2006 . fair-mindedness , Error , and Criminal Law : An Essay in unsounded Epistemology . Cambridge University PressWhitman , J . Q (2008 . The Origins of Reasonable Doubt : Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial . Yale University PressPAGEPAGE 2Crimin al Law...If you want to get a full essay, rat it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay