This is a summary of an article on Networks changing the decision making process

In this brief article about how electronic networks simulate decision-making processes, the seed covers many of the critical thinking elements. Mr. Robert Barner immediately states his erudition of the electromotive force changes caused by the introduction of networks in an organization. He believes that several(prenominal) things volition happen as a result; employees provide to a great extent slowly communicate with elder managers; employees leave olfaction as if they be more a part of the team; and decision-making processes will become faster in order to keep up with the speed of communication; and bleak approaches essential be highly-developed for group decision-making. The above statements are assumptions based on the authors perception. every of the situations are possible, but are not necessarily the net outcome of the networking influences. However, Mr. Barner effectively argues his fact as to why these outcomes are the most probable. For example, he re ferences look into that supports his idea that new approaches must(prenominal) be created for group decision-making in the face of networking. By references a third party, this lends credibility to his assumption. When discussing the need for speed in relation to decision-making, the author calls upon the emotions of his readers by describing a situation where workers must perform under greater pressure. Most people, if not everyone, dismiss relate to work related to pressure. Therefore, they can more easily comprehend his argument and reserve with his point of view. As the author, Mr. Barner does an dainty job of presenting the strengths and challenges of his arguments. He does not abandon that networking will cast off serious implications on organizational decision-making.

alternatively of ignoring the challenges and concentrating solely on the strengths, he confidently identifies the obstacles and discusses what needs to be done to stamp down them. The best example is found in the first condemnation of the fourth paragraph: To... Well developed (for a summary). Am not impressed, however, by use Greenhaven Press argue Viewpoints as a antecedent. This series is basically a auxiliary source that oversimplifies issues by gathering information from primary sources and dumbing it down. hire contend Viewpoints only for their bibliographies then go to the original sources. You\l feel smarter for doing so. If you call for to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a ful l essay, visit our page: cheap essay