Public Administration-administrative Law

FACTSThis case involves the pupils in a Dade County Junior High tone down who stimulate d for damages and declaratory relief with become a line to the allegations that the students were subjected to corporeal penalisation which violated their thoroughgoing rights .

The school room argued in response that such embodied punishment was allowed nether(a) the regulations that were released authorizing such punishment to be carried out under nonindulgent specificationsISSUESThe basic issue here is whether or non the spell of such corporal punishment falls under the drab on cruel and unusual punishment contained in the eighter AmendmentThe second issue in this case is whether or non the fourteenth Amendment requires comment and hearing before the imposition of corporal punishmentHELDAnent the first issue , the ultimate mash ruled that the ferine and laughable Punishment Clause under the Eighth Amendment does not keep back to disciplinary corporal punishment in schools . The Supreme judiciary reasoned that the jurisprudence has consistently maintained that the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment only applies to harbor those who arrest been charged and convicted of crimesOn the second issue , the Supreme Court held that notice and hearing is not required for the imposition of the corporal punishment in public schools . The essential consideration in this press is that the corporal punishment not exceed the limitat ions that have been setINGRAHAM VS WRIGHT k! nave PAGE 1 of NUMPAGES 2...If you want to get a integral essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay