Executive Summary Expedia vs Priceline Essay Example for Free

Executive Summary Expedia vs Priceline EssayExpedia and Priceline are the leading competitors of the online travel service. With travel existence one of the cyberspaces hottest commodities, these two companies have been in competition for the top spot. Both businesses offer great deals on hotels, car rentals, and most importantly travel accommodations. The financial post online interviewed Expedias managing director Sean Shannon about how he keeps the online travel superstore unique. He noted that they invest a lot in technology and software writers and coders, who nominate to make the shopping experience better and figure out ways to stay ahead of the curve (Ovsey, 2001). With both companies reaching new heights of Internet success, the need to be informed of each others business policies and ideas is very important.Many guests of both Expedia and Priceline already had a combined travel part that would normally have taken care of their travel plans. When the Internet boom exploded, companies such as Microsoft jumped on the idea of having a travel agency online. The bulwark Street Journal Online Edition confirms this need for technology by reporting on the companys participation in J.P. Morgans annual telecommunication conference. The Wall Street Journal agrees, Expedia, Inc. is the largest online travel company in the world, with an extensive brand portfolio that includes some of the worlds leading online travel brands (Expedia, inc. to, 2013). This would enable a new customer base that would promote Internet sales, and an easier way of life for frequent travelers.Selling points for both of these companies is extremely important, as the transition from a brick and mortar company to a web based company was a hard shift. These companies have not only been in competition for everywhere 10 years, but they have boosted wage every year. The Atlantic Online posted an opinion about Priceline in 2010 regarding the success of the online travel company comp ared to that of Expedia. They stated, Pricelines stock price is up almost 90 percent, dapple its competitors have flat lined (Expedia) (Madrigal, 2010).This shows the customer, that even though these companies are in competition, they have done well enough to withstand many economic ups and downs over the years. The importance of stability and growth over the years is very important to a consumer who deserves quality in purchasing potentially high dollar items. The by-line report specifics the financial reports from the last three years for both companies. This provides established proof that both companies are thriving in what they do.

Assignment “Introduction to Leadership” Essay Example for Free

Assignment Introduction to Leadership EssayLeadership way of lifes When looking at feedership style I necessitate to look at what as a motorcoach I am good at and that has got me to the position as Manager and what I pee to do to progress my team. Firstly I need to gain the respect of my team by treating every bingle fairly. Leadership is defined as the process in which an separate influences the group of individuals to attain a common goal. The goal is attained by mutual cooperation and cohesive behaviour. A leader infuses a sense of gainfulness and directs some others to reach the specified goal. A leader is someone who stands non only for his cause solely takes responsibility and motivates other individuals alike. There is a clear going away between being a manager and a leader. A leader is a motivation for others and inspires individuals to aim high and attain that aim.However a manager only supervises over his subordinates. Power naturally comes to a leader on ly when that power is not a tool of leader. To be a good lead I prolong to look at the managers around me and what in my opinion makes them good or bad leaders and also if these atomic number 18 traits that I shag reconcile and use or finally will they be out of character for me and be counterproductive for me. Using the Paul and Kenneth Blanchard model of Situational Leadership- coitus this is where a person has low qualification and low willingness maybe a new starter. This is the style I would use for a new starter who does not yet have the skills to operate independently. Selling this is where a person would have low ability but high willingness.This style I would use on someone like Dave in the office he wants to do a good job but is of an age that he does not quite have the skills he needs but he more than makes up for that with his knowledge of the job. So I need to draw on his experience to help him accomplish his goals. Participating this is for a person will hig h ability and low willingness. This leadership style I would use on Becca as she has the ability but when things are going against her tends to try and hide from difficult circumstances so i would have a discussion with her and give her the support needed to scram the job done. Delegating this is for High ability and high willingness.This i am more than comfortable using on Ann and Mel as they have shown that they can well do the tasks i clothe them. I have also set them individual tasks looking at how we can improve our day to day activities and in the end make our lives easier in the long run. After doing the test I came down as someone who was fairly evenly spread of tell, selling and participating but who does not delegate this is something I have known about and my team has told me and something I can now begin to addressReview of own leadership behaviour-I am relatively new in the role of Sales office Manager. I have progressed from a role within the pulverization by doi ng an excellent job as a traffic planner. I took all the information gain by talking to people and being in the loop within the factory. I took in account what the factory could do and what our customer expectations were which allowed us to plan what was needed and by when to meet what the customer in reality needed. Being new to the sales role I have had to take myself out the information loop and learn a new role. I have had to learn a new computer system and at the same time be the role model for my team. Whilst doing this I have made myself easy for any problems the team has but have tried to show that I can do the job and also help team members who have been doing it for years. I currently have a team of five people all with varying abilities. I have two long serving members of staff one part time and two that started at the beginning of the year.With no two members of staff the same I have had to employ different leadership style i.e. with Dave he is coming up to retirement and I would say he was low on ability he has a high willingness to complete tasks set so with him I would employ the sexual congress leadership style which was very similar with my two new starters but as the months progressed they both showed high ability but one was more willing to achieve than the other so with Becca I had to show a participating style of leadership and with Mel I am able to delegate more as she showed both high ability and high willingness. The factory as a whole is very unionised and whilst the bulk of the staff are in the union they do generally like to get the job done and if this means working long stressful hours they do.When we are in these situations I will change my leadership style to match the situation where it be acting on their behalf to speak to people who they have force with (maybe another member of staff or even customers) or by re-enforcing procedures that are there to make the lives easier or by finding courses that will ultimately give them the tools to make their jobs easier in the long run. I have spoken to members of the team and other managers around the office and all have said I try to do too much and that I need to learn to delegate and whilst this doesnt come naturally to me (my preferred leadership style was telling and participating) I have taken their comments on board and have started to delegate a lot more around the team and focused on other areas within the team that would help them to improve and grow.I can improve myself as a leader by listening to others and taking advice and giving and receiving feedback and also by doing courses and re assessing myself to look at things from a different angle and point of view. Within the factory I am constantly being assessed and feedback wedded my goals are constantly moving but I personally need to delegate more to enable me to grow as a manager.I have also started to meet other Sales office managers within the group so I know that the job I have been doing whi lst not precisely the same as other sites is very similar and I havent been doing that bad a job but perception is everything so I have to look at promoting myself with the site and also more importantly to other sites what I have to say has value and I can toy a lot to the table but I also have to look at the individuals within my team and look at their maturity levels and adapt my leadership to what is needed to each individual and also learn to delegate more.

Impact of Sound on the Film Industry

Impact of Sound on the Film IndustryThe Advancement of Film Through SoundDuring the late 1880s the motion cam time was invented, a few years later the film industry was created. The head start films were usually about everyday life, people walking or playing a fast one these films were usually very short. This was the era of the silent film. Gradually film started to expand rapidly, new technology enabled films to be arrange more complicated, with a storyline and the camera angles. The coarse Train Robbery, was one of the first films to incorporate the different camera shots while having a story line. The only thing that these movies were missing was the put on of dialogue, honest effects, and music. Sound is truly one of the things that set the film industry on a path to successes. Film makers are continuously use practiced to precaution them in convening the emotions they want their audience to feel when they watch their movies. Though much of the advancements of the film in dustry, undecomposed has become the most important aspect of movies it has come a long way since the silent era in film history, movies would not be the same without it.The start of the film industry was a gigantic land mark in itself, but without incorporation of fail, they would not throw away become the multimillion dollar industry that it is today. In the late 19th and early ordinal century Americans were flooding into theaters to watch the latest movie that was out, but in those days the movies were generally very short and had no audio. To compensate for the lack of dear theaters would often have a pianist playing music on a piano or on the organ he would provide the prerequisite die affects movies needed. The Lumire Brothers were very popular in creating these early silent films. Thomas Edison had been trying to come up with a way to incorporate headphone in to film with the use of a phonograph but was un- successful. But his ideas would lead to the huge milestone f or the advancement of sound in film during the nineteen twenties. In early portion of the twentys the Vitaphone was invented. The Vitaphone was a sound-on-disc system using multiple 33 1/3 rpm discs developed by Bell recall Laboratories and Western Electric In August 1926, Warner Brothers debuted the first Vitaphone film Don Juan (Kay). Thought this movie did use the Vitaphone, to replace the organist, the film still did not use dialogue. The first film to incorporate the use of music and dialogue was The Jazz Singer, this was considered the end of the silent era and beginning of the talkies. In 1928 Walt Disney would release the move Steamboat Willie It was the first film to completely create a soundtrack in post production including sound effects, music, and dialogue (Kay). Many critics at the m believed that the incorporation of sound with the real movies would lead to the down fall of the art, and would ruin the entertainment value. Boy was they wrong the advancement of sound lead to a more hooked audience who couldnt attend to get enough of the theater. These early advancements in sound would aid in the finishedion of sound.With the innovation and incorporation of sound in movies, film makers wanted to in the end be able to perfect the art and be able to use it to convey the cinematographer message more efficiently. One of the most significant achievements in film history was made by Murray Spivak, who was the sound director for King Kong He was the first person to manipulate sound in a creative way. Spivak apply the sound of a lions roar slowed down one octave mixed with the sound at unity pitch (Kay). Spivak used sound in a way that it had never been used before he also paved the path for future sound directors. Walt Disney became renowned in nineteen forties he created some of the most important innovations in sound, some of which are still being used today. Some of these creations included the pan-pot, overdubbing of orchestral parts, the mult ichannel surround system, and simultaneous multi-track arranging just to name a few. The film Fantasia by Disney was the first to use The state-of-the-art digital sound dubbing and screening facility. Sound mixers blend dialogue, music, and sound effects tracks to the various levels appropriate for a movie theater (Walt Disney Internet Group). This technology allowed them to make a audience sit on the edge of their seats because the sound could excite a theater thats was three quarters of the way full. This was a huge advancement in technology and Walt Disney definitely set the benchmark high. Before Disney movies did not have the seamless interaction between dialogue, music, and sound effects they were very choppy and were one of the biggest complaints from movie goers. Another important creation in the advancement of sound was created by Ray Dolby who in 1965 invented the Dolby A-type noise reduction. It was a sophisticated new form of audio compression and expansion that dramat ically reduced the background hiss inherent in professional tape recording without discernible side effects on the material being record (Dolby Laboratories Inc ). Its original purpose was for use in recording studios to produce clearer tracks but the film industries used it as an aid to allow them to make clearer sounding movies. In 1976 A Star Is Born became the first Dolby Stereo film. Dolby Stereo was a 4-channel format phase matrixed into a two channel format (Kay). This was significant because, on the Dolby Stereo they could encoded it into any format including FM, tape, or recording.The present day of sound extends from about the nineteen eighties to today, we are still coming up with advancements in the way we use sound. The main goal for Sound directors today is to make dialogue, sound effects, and music blend together in a seamless behavior to the point that it seems realistic. This illusion is created from the new technology that we have today such as Dolby Digital which is the standard in the industry, it is also used to record sound on to DVDs. With the creation of louder higher definition speakers in theater and surround sound for home theaters the stress for sound directors is becoming more and more important. They have their job cut out for them because this new technology is making it easier to pick out flaws in sound. To make sure that sound quality is near perfect sound directors work on a single move for months and months editing in and out different sound clips, playing with the frequency and pitch of the sound until it is perfect. With the higher definition speakers big blockbusters often dont spare cost when it comes to sound. Image watching a movie like the Fast and the Furious or the exterminator without sound or bad quality sound, it would not be the same right. Sound improves the quality of the movie. That is why sound directors spend so much time on perfecting there art, so you can every horse in the engine when it is revving or b ullets hitting off of a metal robot. It is these qualities that make movies so aesthetic to watch and listen to.The innovation of sound in movies has come a long way, and will continue to grow, it is one of the most important factors in a movie and can make or break a Hollywood blockbuster. Sound has come a long way from the silent era in film history. After the silent films came the talkies the firs movies to use sound. With ingenious innovations form such patrons as Walt Disney and Ray Dolby, we are able to experience the best sound in movies. It is the sound in movies that creates suspense that makes us sit on the edge of our seats with our heart rushing. Without the use of sound this would not be possible. The movies that appal us and leave us panting wanting more could not happen without the scary background music. People use to believe that sound very would ruin the art of cinematography, it has done the opposite movies today are just getting better and better. Without sound in movies we would just be left feel at a screen.Works CitedDolby Laboratories Inc. Dolby The Companys Founding. Dolby Laboratories. Web. 11 Mar. 2010. .Kay, Jonathan. Film Sound History 20s. Middle Tennessee State University. Web. 12 Mar. 2010. .Walt Disney Internet Group. History. The Walt Disney Studios. Web. 13 Mar. 2010. .

Impact of Chemotherapy Induced Diarrhoea (CID)

Impact of Chemotherapy Induced Diarrhoea (CID)This assignment will critically explore one impact of suffercer treatment, examining the physiologic nature of the impact. I will analyse st footstepgies for alleviating the impact, considering the contribution of the multi-disciplinary team. I will discuss the contribution of healthcare professionals to holistic care analysing the professional and ethical dimensions of practice. ultimately I will evaluate the effectiveness of the current management of the identified impact.The one impact of cancer treatment which I deal chosen to go to at is chemotherapy induced looseness (CID). The London Cancer Alliance (2013) melodic themes that patients receiving chemotherapy are at risk of developing severe dissolution, and the prevalence has been account to be as high as 5080%. Sherman (2008) explains that diarrhoea has a significant impact on quality of life and can contribute to malnutrition, weight loss, immunosuppression, and mortality. I have personally encountered CID in my practice and have seen how debilitating it can be for good users both physiologically and psychologically.According to Stein (2010) the pathophysiology of chemotherapy induced diarrhoea is multifaceted, complex and still undergoing further investigation.This is overly acknowledged by Gibson and Keefe (2006) who believe that CID is likely to be caused by combinations of varying factors which include, altered gut motility colonic irrigation crypt damage, impairing water absorption in the colon, changes to enteric microflora, affecting absorption and altered fluid transport in the colon.Robinson and Dobish (2007) believe that the absorptive and secretory capacity within the gut is altered during chemotherapy imputable to the toxicity damaging the intestinal epithelium, inflammation of the bowel wall and superficial necrosis. Which according to Stringer (2009) causes a difference between secretion and absorption in the small bowel resulting in diarrhoea.Viele (2003) suggests that there are two mechanisms by which chemotherapy may induce this. First, the diarrhoea is caused by changes in intestinal absorption which may or may not be accompanied by excessive electrolyte and fluid secretion. Second, the diarrhoea may be a egress of a combination of mechanical and biochemical changes caused by the chemotherapy.These intestinal functional changes are thought to be a result of direct toxicity of the chemotherapy on the colonic crypt stem cells. Death of these cells leads to a cascading effect where immature crypt cells attempt to compensate by releasing more secretory compounds (Viele, 2003).The small intestine is also thought to play a role whereby the villi are unable to absorb fluids correctly, leading to a skewed ratio of fluid absorption and secretion. In addition, chemotherapy is reported to destroy the brush b launch enzymes, which are responsible for the digestion of both carbohydrates and proteins, and this causes mo re gut-wall secretions to occur (Rutledge and Engelking, 2008).Sharma (2005) informs us that if CID is uncontrolled the consequences can be devastating both physically and psychologically. According to Cherny (2008) diarrhoea can lead to, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, renal issues and even death. Viele (2003) reminds us that the impact if CID is not just physiological, the psychological effects of diarrhoea include depression, cordial isolation and anxiety. Patients suffering from CID will often require additional healthcare resources, such as admission, which will raise the cost of the patients care for the healthcare service (Dranitsaris et al 2005). Arnold (2005) explains that CID can interfere with cancer treatments affecting scheduled treatment plans, dose reductions ultimately leading to a worse outcome.In a pondering study of cancer patients who acquired CID, Arnold et al (2005) discovered that 65% of patients experienced a decrease in dose intensity, a dose reduction was required in 45%, a delay in treatment was experienced in 71%, and 3% had their therapy discontinued. Maroun et al (2007) conclude that treatment delays, discontinuation and dose reductions have a direct adverse effect on patient mortality and morbidity. Therefore authorize objectives must be in place in order to manage chemotherapy induced diarrhoea effectively. According to Skelley (2005), healthcare professionals must travelly diagnose and treat patients with CID, minimise treatment delays, maximise chemo intensity and therefore maximise the patients quality of life whilst undertaking treatment.Skelley (2005) states that to manage diarrhoea in an acute setting effectively healthcare provide need to maintain an accurate posterior chart and should grade diarrhoea using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Diarrhoea. The London Cancer Alliance (2013) supports the use of a judge system and shows one in their management literature and has added symptoms into the table to help aid in grading diarrhoea more effectively.The LCA (2013) add that mucositis and neutropenia from the chemotherapy treatment can also significantly increase complications associated with CID. Prompt recognition and swift appropriate treatment are essential. Therefore by completing the aforementioned measures, medical staff are enabled to choose the correct treatment options and it also helps to monitor the effectiveness of the treatment. Also we must ensure that a stool culture taken, so as to rule out any infections or other causes which could further prolong or alter treatment plans.It is important for healthcare professionals to actively encourage patients to report their bowel movements, because patients can fear that reporting diarrhoea will delay their treatment (Maroun, 2007). As a healthcare professional we should aim to reassure patients that prompt diagnosis and early treatment can prevent delays to their chemotherapy.According to Cherny (2008) pati ents with CID should have a full assessment including medical history, provenderary history and medication review. in front treating CID other common causes of diarrhoea should be considered and excluded. These could include, adverse medication effects, concurrent Disease such as, Crohns disease, diverticulitis and ulcerative colitis, viral Infection, bacterial Infection, faecal Impaction, diet and psychological Factors (LSA, 2013).Benson (2004) believes that patient education is the vital underpinning to the management of CID and before commencing chemotherapy, patients must be fully informed of the potential risks and what actions to take, if they develop diarrhoea.Patients will require nutritional advice and the LCA (2013) guides us by showing the initial management for CID which we can in turn offer to patients. This includes drinking 810 large glasses of clear fluids per day to prevent dehydration and stopping lactose-containing products since lactose intolerance can develop when the mucosa is damaged. Patients need to avoid spices, high-fibre foods, high-fat foods, caffeine, alcohol and fruit juices. Small public meals such as bananas, toast and plain pasta are also recommended. There are many more aspects to dietary advice therefore input from a dietician would be beneficial.Benson et al (2004) show that in diarrhoea grades 12 Loperamide is the recommended medication, 4mg followed by 2mg after every loose stool up to 16mg daily. If diarrhoea persists, high dose Loperamide should be used and Codeine Phosphate 3060mg QDS can be added, also a stool culture needs to be taken if not previously done. The patient will need to be admitted to hospital if not already an inpatient if the diarrhoea persists or becomes grade 3-4 after 24-48 hours. At this point Octreotide is the recommended treatment as a sub-cutaneous injection, 300mcg/24hr for 5 days, increasing to 600mcg/24hr if not effective (LCA, 2013).According to Barbounis et al (2001) Octreotide has a 60% 90% success rate in resolving persistent diarrhoea. Zidane (2001) explains that although Octreotide has proven to be more successful than Loperamide, it still remains as a second line treatment due to its high cost.Chemotherapy induced diarrhoea has tremendous effects on patients quality of life, the management of cancer patients requires increased attention to this side effect from holds. Targeted education is involve to help nurses implement systematic assessment and documentation.Nurses must ensure to communicate effectively with patients and caregivers in every setting about the nature of diarrhoea and its causes, as well as develop appropriate interventions for each individual. As such, nurses need to maintain current knowledge of the causes and available treatment strategies for CID. It is also imperative to remember the beneficial effect that diet may play in alleviating diarrhoea symptoms.Reference ListArnold, R. J. Gabrail, N. Raut, M. Kim, R. Sung, J. C. Zhou, Y. (200 5) Clinical implications of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cancer. The Journal of substantiative Oncology, 3(3), pp. 227-232. Available at http//www.oncologypractice.com/jso/journal/articles/0303227.pdf (Accessed 22 ring 2014).Benson, A.B. Ajani, J.A. Catalano, R.B. Engelking, C. Kornblau, S.M. Martenson, J.A. (2004) Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, pp. 29182926. Available at http//jco.ascopubs.org/content/22/14/2918.long (Accessed 30 March 2014).Cherny, N. I. (2008). Evaluation and management of treatment-related diarrhea in patients with advanced cancer A review. Journal of Pain Symptom trouble, 36(4), pp. 413-423. Available at http//download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0885-3924/PIIS088539240800111 5.pdf (Accessed 8 April 2014).Dranitsaris, G. Maroun, J. Shah, A. (2005) Severe chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer A cost of illness analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 13(5), pp. 318-324. Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15614493 (Accessed 01 April 2014).Gibson, R J. Keefe, D M. (2006) Cancer chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea and constipation mechanisms of damage and prevention strategies. Support Care Cancer. 14, pp 890900. Available at http//link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-006-0040-y (Accessed 01 April 2014).Hogan, C M. (1998) The nurses role in diarrhea management. Oncology Nurses Forum. 25 (5), pp879-86. Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9644704 (Accessed 23 March 2014).London Cancer Alliance (2013) LCA acute accent Oncology Clinical Guidelines. Available at http//www.londoncanceralliance.nhs.uk/media/56533/FINAL LCA Acute Oncology Clinical Guidelines September 2013.pdf (Accessed 9 March 2011).Maroun, J.A. Anthony, L.B. Blais, N. Burkes, R. Dowden, S.D. Dranitsaris, G. (2007) Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer a consensus st atement by the Canadian running(a) group on chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Current Oncology, 14, pp. 1320. Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1891194/ (Accessed 10 March 2014).Rutledge, D N. Engelking, C. (2008) Cancer-related diarrhea selected findings of a national survey of oncology nurse experiences. Oncology Nurses Forum. 25, pp 861873. Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9644704 (Accessed 01 September 2012).Sharma, R. Tobin, P. Clarke, SJ. (2005) Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhoea. Oncology. 6, pp. 93102. Available at http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204505017353 (Accessed 5 April 2014).Sherman, D S. Fish, D N. (2008). Management of protease inhibitor associated diarrhea. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 30, pp 908914. Available at http//cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/6/908.long (Accessed 01 April 2014).Skelley, K. (2005) Management of chemotherapy induced diarrhoea in adults with cancer (Online). Available at http//www.ruh.nhs.uk/about/policies/documents/clinical_policies/ local/405%202006 %20Management%20of%20Chemotherapy%20Induced% 20Diarrhoea.pdf (Accessed 22 March 2014).Stein, A. Voigt, W. Jordan, K. (2010) Review Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea pathophysiology, frequency and guideline-based management. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology. 2 (51). Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles /PMC3126005/pdf/10.1177_1758834009355164.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2014).Stringer, A.M. Gibson, R.J. Logan, R.M. Bowen, J.M. Yeoh, A.S. Laurence, J. (2009) Irinotecan-induced mucositis is associated with changes in intestinal mucins. Cancer Chemotherapy Pharmacology, 64, pp. 123132. Available at http//www.springerlink.com/content/d45k70508772318j (Accessed 3 April 2014).Viele, C. S. (2003) Overview of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Oncology Nursing, 19(4 Suppl 3), pp. 2-5. Available at http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S074920810300114 (Ac cessed 23 March 2014).Zidan, J. Haim, N. Beny, A. Stein, M. Gez, E. Kuten, A. (2001) Octreotide in the treatment of severe chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Annual Oncology, 12, pp. 227229. Available at http//annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/2/227.long (Accessed 22 March 2014).

Homosexuality Post War

Homo in pathality Post WarThe Democratisation of Gender after the cozy Offences venture (1967) and How It Affects Queer StudiesE.M. Forsters novel Maurice, write in the midst of 1913 and 1914, but not published after his death in 1970, is a seminal work providing a moving, person-to-person portrayal of homosexualism and homophobia in 20th-century England. Exploration of its detailed accounts of attitudes rough homosexuals and their various reactions to the discrimination they facedfor instance, denying their homosexuality and marrying embracing their homosexuality, but discreetly leaving the country for more than open-minded culturesserves as an excellent starting point for exploring the underlying cultural framework and values which will random variable the subject matter of this essay. Of no sm all note is that Forster, whose written report as a literary genius, believed his let homosexuality besides powerful a secret to come out, as it were, until after his death, in a charge squandering his own hearty power and the potential to liberate both himself and other homosexuals.Britain, origin of so oftentimes cultural and policy-making vibrancy and of the participatory principles which argon now held to be self-evident in modern Western nations, had a particularly difficult time ridding itself of a virulent and persistent form of discrimination its stubbornly conservative refusal to accept homosexuality and homosexual behaviours into the cultural norm of its orderliness. Indiscreet homosexuals in England of the 20th century could look for contendd to a life of bigotry and discrimination, to say nothing of financial and personal ruin and imprisonment, as homosexuality was still a sad offence in England until 1967.The limits of the sexually acceptable are still there. Geographical location and economic status signifi dischargetly affect how free individuals are to choose to be open about their sexual orientation. And some orientations are still problematic. As the above quotation suggests, the furnish of homosexuality remains a divisive issue. This is in provoke of forty forms passing since the decriminalisation of homosexuality in Britain forty years that put on also witnessed the animated fellowship (both males and females) bear upon in from the margins of mainstream society in order to occupy more powerful positions of authority. This has been meted out in governmental office, in popular culture and in the global mass media. Yet, in spite of this, there remains at the dawn of the twenty first century a sense that homosexuality is a lifestyle that stands at odds to all that decent society holds dear. Even in the United Kingdom, probably the most secular country in the world, the object lesson aspect of homosexuality is never furthermost from the surface of the debate over how sprightly heap are supposed to integrate into a predominantly heterosexual sphere. This is the crux of the debate discussed herein. For the purpose of perspective, the sideline essay must adopt an integrated approach, attempting to synthesise the theoretical and historiographical debates regarding the experiences of zippy people in post state of war Britain. In this management, we enkindle trace the social, political and sound evolution of the democratisation and braggyisation of sexuality and sex activity in the UK while at the same time offering a critique of the aims and achievements of the fearless cause at this time. Furthermore, the continuities and changes of the homosexual landscape in post war Britain can be more accurately depicted amid the relevant academic lit of the times. A conclusion can then be sought that attempts to place the versed Offences motivate of 1967 inside its correct historical and theoretical setting. First, however, a shortened overview of this Act of Parliament must be ascertained so as to establish a conceptual framework for the remainder of the discussion.The Sexual Offences Act that was passed by Westminster in 1967 was a landmark piece of legislation that sought to address the harsh legal inequalities between homosexual and heterosexual people with regards to their private lives and the way in which these private lives were dictated by the public and political sphere. The impetus behind the reform of laws pertaining to homosexuality in the United Kingdom came from the Wolfendon Report, which was commissi wizd in 1957 to exaltedlight the essential differences between crime and sin. Essentially, while society and the manufacturing of cultural consensus may indeed have deemed homosexuality as a sin (or a sickness) to equate it with criminality was deemed in many circles to be asynchronous and blight against post war British well-behavedisation and its values. This is an important point and unmatched that ought to be borne in mind throughout the discussion the 1967 Sexual Offences Act marked the first serious attempt at the legal decriminalis ation of homosexuality in the United Kingdom since the Buggery Act of 1533 when the British state first sought to wrest the issue of sunny twin away from the ecclesiastical courts and into the legal courts of the realm. Viewed through this prism, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act can be experiencen to be a symptom of the broader civil rights movement of the 1960s which oversaw the criminalisation of inequality relating to gender, race, creed and organized religion in all of the major countries of the western hemisphere. The Act could not have come about without there first having been in place the existence of liberal youth culture that was able to use the tools available within a democratic state in order to lobby the political establishment for social and cultural reform.Thus, although the Act itself has since been open to charges of hypocrisy (the result of the Act witnessed an increase rather than a decrease in the numbers of arrests of gay men for good luck the new law) and prej udice (the Act distinctly and identifiably differentiates between homosexual and heterosexual people with regards to the age of assume with twenty one creation apply for gay people in comparison to sixteen for straight people) it should nevertheless still be seen as an important milestone in the evolution of a more egalitarian British society. Certainly, in legal harm, 1967 must be seen as the starting point of any discussion with regards to the democratisation of homosexuality in post war Britain as before the advent of the Sexual Offences Act homosexual acts were seen as essentially criminal activities and therefore placed outside of the bound of the rules, regulations and customs of decent, civilised society. Therefore, while mainstream culture and the political establishment may well have both publicly and privately continued to denounce homosexuality in all its forms as a sin (and preferred to keep homosexuality firmly outside of the realms of civilised society), the remov al of the spectre of a criminal offence telegraphed a major turning point in the way in which gay people were viewed and treated in post war Britain. Furthermore, without the Act, the ensuant achievements of the gay movement in the UK would never have been able to begin to take place as the legal framework in which the gay movement lobbied for reform during the 1970s and 1980s would not have existed. Democratisation of sexuality in post war Britain thus begins in 1967.However, as suggested above, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act has left itself open (particularly within the gay community) to claims of being as an essentially conservative measure that was still passed due to conditions of political expediency as contend to the political establishment in Britain actually wishing to see a tangible democratisation of sexuality. By establishing such a high age of consent for gay couples, the Act only served to cement the social stigma associated with homosexuality because after this poin t it was seen by law in Britain to be a coupling that was deemed unsuitable (and illegal) for young people to engage in. Considering that the teenage years are the most important stage of sexual development in both males and females, the high age of consent deliberately aimed to restrict the practice of homosexuality amongst the really demographic that would be most likely to engage in experimental sexuality. This only increased the sordid image of homosexuals in Britain at the time, implying that adult homosexual men were in some way intent upon grooming young males to sum their own sexual brand of subculture. Viewed through this prism, the Sexual Offences Act can be seen to be a positive legal step but likewise a negative cultural step. The increase in the number of arrests of gay men in the years that immediately followed 1967 should be seen as testimony to this ultimate perpetuation of inequality pertaining to sexuality which was the socio-political residue of the Sexual Offe nces Act. In this way, the myth of the permissive society was established to satisfy the libertarian ideology of the left wing of the political elite. The satisfaction and status of gay people, on the other hand, seems not to have been a consideration concerning the passing of this landmark piece of domestic legislation.In unique(predicate) footing of the evolution of fairy possibleness, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act can be seen to have helped to create fertile grounds for the blossoming of the domestic and internationalistic gay rights movement because of the way in which the Act of Parliament served to legally solidify the differences between homosexual and heterosexual people. This sense of marginalisation from mainstream society was aided by the Stonewall Riots which took place in new-sprung(prenominal) York City in 1969 in response to police brutality against homosexual and transgender people at the Stonewall club in Greenwich Village. This episode provided the impetus be hind the formation of the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) which was established in July 1969, quickly becoming a trans-national phenomenon that deeply influenced the gay rights movement in the UK. The cumulative result of the prejudices legalised in the 1967 Sexual Offences Act in addition to the prejudices brutally realised in New York City in the Stonewall Riots was to construct a gay movement that was both durable and international. Furthermore, the perceived injustices of the 1960s also served to ally the lesbian and gay movements so that one tangible homosexual community was evident by the turn of the decade in both Europe and the United States of America. This time period was therefore a crucial moment in the development of hybridise possibleness in post war Britain.However, it can be argued that by forming a global gay movement that judged membership with the movement in terms of sexual identity, international movements such as the Gay Liberation Front succeeded only in affirmin g the divisions entrap forward by measures like the Sexual Offences Act. Queer theory, from the outset, was intent upon challenging the mainstream socio-political status quo by using means that were essentially counter productive in light of the gay movements arguments that gender and sexual identity was not fixed or compartmentalised according to ones sexuality but was in fact much more fluid and interchangeable. Indeed, muff theorists have since argued that the compartmentalisation of gender is likewise flawed with Anne Fausto-Sterling arguing that male and female are not enough. By separating them(heterosexuals) from us (homosexuals and transsexuals) the queer movement merely served to corroborate the fragmented vision of mainstream society and to further alienate homosexuality from mainstream culture and, as a result, to condemn queer theory to a patent subculture status. Consequently, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act taken within the broader context of the worldwide civil righ ts movement of the 1960s can be seen to be an important milestone within the evolution of queer theory as not only did politicised society initiate a clear dividing line between the homosexual and the heterosexual communities but also the homosexual community itself was largely responsible after this point for perpetuating this divide. In the final analysis therefore, it is difficult to create by mental act this development as positive or progressive. Indeed, as Michael Botnick demonstrates below, this wishing of awareness on both sides of the historical debate resulted in a discernible lack of consensus by the turn of the millennium.The lack of open-mindedness toward labyrinthian and graduated positions makes it difficult to obtain a full hearing of the issues, especially if those issues are value laden and cognitively dissonant to the audience (generally the public at large, the state, major corporations or other mega- administrations such as the media.)At this point in the di scussion, attention must move away from the historiographic look at the formation of the gay rights movement within the context of the late 1960s to turn instead towards analysis of queer theory in post war twentieth century Britain. As has already been intimated, the evolution of queer theory in the UK is intrinsically tied to the advent of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967. The injustices conceptualised in this Act served to galvanise the gay community amid the broader backdrop of a civil rights movement that was established in order to attempt to hand parity on the grounds of race, religion and gender as well as parity on the grounds of sexuality. This wider multicultural influence is the key to taking into custody how the doctrine of queer theory in post war Britain quickly became divorced from the social, cultural and political earthly concern of maintaining a subcultural movement within the context of a liberal democracy. It is certainly no coincidence that the guiding princ iple of queer theory was inherently similar to the guiding principle of the other civil rights movements of the epoch all highlighted the fallacy of using identity (be it sexual, racial, religious or gender) as a means of organising political society. All of these movements should therefore be viewed as part of a wider post-structuralist theory which advocated the end of identity based upon gender, sexuality, race and religion in favour of adopting a more egalitarian approach. In this way, post-structuralist theory was keen to destroy the link between dominant western forms of rationality with male power and control over women and nature, which is associated with violence, oppression and destruction.Queer theory should be seen as an important part of this desire to deconstruct male-ordered politicised society and to reconstruct this society not along lines pertaining to identity but along lines pertaining to humanity instead. In terms of results, the deconstruction of male-centric s ociety can be seen to have had a positive impact upon the fusion of homosexual and heterosexual cultures in post war Britain, certainly after the 1980s when the acquired immune deficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States quickly became a worldwide manifestation of what Stan Cohen had in the 1970s referred to as moral panic disseminated by an increasingly powerful global mass media apparatus. Whereas the 1970s and the 1980s can be seen as a historical period of tenacity with regards to the perpetuation of sexuality-based injustices in Britain, the mid-nineties on the other hand can be interpreted as a period of change when the barriers constructed by male-ordered mainstream society were slowly, yet clearly being eroded in obvious ways. Politicians, for instance, in the 1990s were no longer punished in any tangible electoral way for being outed as homosexual. The briefly successful New Labour career of Peter Mandelson is testimony to this development. Likewise in popular cultu re where international stars such as George Michael (who was afraid to admit his sexuality in the 1980s) have been able to thrive in both the heterosexual and homosexual spheres regardless of their own sexual preferences since the 1990s. The turn of the millennium also witnessed a legal progression concerning gay people and their civil rights with amendments to the Sexual Offences Act (passed in 2003) in Britain ultimately giving rise to parity with heterosexual people with regards to the age of consent. Indeed, it can be argued that the 2003 Sexual Offences Amendment Act is as fundamental and extensive as the changes which were telegraphed when the thieving Act (1968) replaced the outmoded Larceny Act (1916). In the UK in the twenty first century the age of consent for both heterosexual and homosexual people is at last set at sixteen, finally putting to an end the decades-long association of homosexuality with perversity and social abnormality.Yet, appearances can be deceptive. W hile the 1990s and the first decade of the twenty first century may appear to be the dawn of a new era of equality with regards to gender and sexuality, the reality may in fact be better understood as a period of tenaciousness with the perceived advances of gay people during this time being nothing more than a mirage as male-dominated society continues to give piecemeal concessions to those marginalised elements of post modern culture in order to maintain the faade of a permissive contemporary society.It seems were an altogether more open, more tolerant, sexier society and its getting better all the time. Or is it? Is mainstream culture just flirting with a modus operandi of the other in order to keep us all on a broadly straight line?This sense of duplicity inherent concerning queer theory and socio-political reality in the contemporary era has served to render queer theory a doctrine of continuing importance in western culture. coeval gender theorists such as Judith moreoverl er (whos book Gender Trouble was published in 1990 selling over 100 000 copies internationally) directly challenged the notion of gender (and indeed sexuality) as a means of cultural identity, going so far as to cite the creation of international feminism as the reason behind womens continuing experience of inequality. Butler thus called for a re-evaluation of queer theory in light of the mistakes made by the various civil, gender and sexual rights movements of the 1960s.The domains of political and linguistic representation set out in advance the criterion by which subjects themselves are formed, with the result that representation is extended only to what can be acknowledged as a subject. In other words, the qualifications for being a subject must first be met before representation can be extended.Butlers theory remains a cornerstone for queer theory in post war Britain as the travails of the womens since the passing of the Sex Discrimination Act in 1964 largely mirrors the troubl es of the gay movement since the inception of the Sexual Offences Act in 1967. As a result there is a large soundbox of academic literature available that is dedicated to queer theory and to placing contemporary queer theory within the historiographical context of the gay experience in the by prehistorical forty years. Much of the commentary bequeathed by this body of literature tends to underscore the essential continuity that characterises the development of sexuality in Britain (and indeed throughout the West) since the 1960s. Jeffrey Weeks, for example, sees this continuity as a symptom of contemporary societys inability to comprehend sexuality within its correct (and complex) historical context.There is a struggle for the future of sexuality. But the ways we respond to this have been coloured by the force of the accumulated historical heritage and sexual traditions out of which we have come the Christian organisation of belief in sex as sacramental and threatening, the libert arian belief of sex as subversive, the liberal belief of sex as source of identity and personal resource, all rooted in a melange of religious, scientific and sexological arguments about what sex is, what it can do and what we must or must not do. We are weighed down with a universe of expectations. Sexuality could be a potentiality for choice, change and diversity. Instead we take it as destiny, and all of us, women and men, homosexual and heterosexual, young and old, low and white, are held in its thrall, and pay its expensive dues.Weeks succinct observations quoted above could quite feasibly have featured in his best selling book, Coming Out (originally published in 1977) such is the lack of tangible progress made by mainstream society in the authors view. This is entirely due to the fact that the vast bulk of society has managed to evade the true nature of the issue where sexuality is neither a choice nor a cross to bear but is instead a complex fusion of the two. Weeks conclud es that it is the very absence of a right or wrong answer with regards to the definition of sexuality that makes mainstream society unable to adequately confront the issue of homosexuality even at the start of the twenty first century.Of course, the issue of homosexuality has been greatly affected by the rise in significance (at to the lowest degree in cultural terms) of bisexuality. Not only has bisexuality served to confuse the majority of mainstream society (in so much as mainstream society has been instructed to think in terms of black and white right and wrong) about the nature of homosexuality, the advent of bi-theory has telegraphed a schism in queer theory. Indeed, it is a common view of the bisexual community that traditional queer theory can be understood as a particularly virulent strain of the ailment affecting contemporary theory more generally, especially in so far as it addresses sexuality as a central concern in the guise of queer theory. Thus, the very term queer is seen, ironically, as an exclusive phrase that implies that bisexual people, on account of their continuing sexual association with heterosexual people, are intrinsically more allied to straight culture than they are to the homosexual community. This schism mirrors the divide in the feminist movement when a more radical second flap of feminism drew, in the first instance, upon the theoretical writings of lesbian feminism in the early 1970s only for the lesbian feminist community to later on accuse the heterosexual feminist community of betrayal on the grounds that straight women continued to participate in sexual activity and engage in what Pateman terms sexual contracts with men in the guise of sex, marriage, home and family. Further confusion has been added to this maelstrom with the advent of trans-theory and the increasing legal and political recognition of trans-gender people, which has clearly impacted upon the evolution of queer theory in post war Britain. Jason Cromwell sees this development as making the visible invisible, which is in direct emulation to the principles of the gay community which has historically intended to make the invisible visible.In addition there are not surprisingly critics from the straight mainstream culture who see queer theory as a barrier (rather than a facilitator) to a greater democratisation of sexuality in the contemporary era. Critics argue that queer studies places too much emphasis upon differentiation which, in turn, elevates the status of the gay and lesbian experience to a position that is over and above its true worth within the broader sphere of cultural studies. This only serves to increase the gulf between the included and the excluded members of society. Furthermore, queer theory has been challenged in a more direct way as critics argue the primacy of the queer belief that sexuality is not fixed. Tim Edwards, for example, has recently argued that sexual identity is in fact much more rigid and compartme ntalised than queer theory suggests. Edwards does not agree with the assumptions made by, amongst others, Judith Butler and David Gauntlett who both show how, for instance, the media has helped to solidify the construction of identity based upon gender and sexuality respectively. Instead he argues that in real terms gender and sexual identity does not only exist at the level of discourse (as argued by Butler) but instead exists as an institutional social practice. It can be seen that queer theory and its discontents have historically argued over ideological terrain pertaining to sexuality, gender and identity with a discernible lack of consensus emerging from the ensuing theoretical debates. It is also noticeable that the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 remains largely conspicuous by its absence from the vast majority of this theoretical debate with regards to queer theory in post war Britain. Where the Act is mentioned, it tends to be referred to as a piecemeal political measure that turn up repeatedly unsuccessful, largely because of popular mobilisation against restrictive changes. Even in legal terms, the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 remains open to charges of being a draconian, anachronistic measure by contemporary queer theory as it was still deemed a criminal offence for people under the age of twenty one to engage in homosexual activity. This only served to criminalise the essential experimentalism inherent in young people of both sexes and to perpetuate the association of homosexuality as a sordid and sinful affair.A more important watershed date according to post war queer theorists was the 1980s and the advent of the AIDS epidemic. Beginning on the west coast of the United States and quickly transferring over the Atlantic to Britain and Western Europe, the AIDS epidemic was an epidemic more in terms of the effect that it had upon mainstream, straight culture than the medical effect that the virus had upon the human race. Looking back on the media texts and images of the time, one can certainly see how the disease was blown out of all proportion to its true danger. Furthermore, it is plain to see that this was due to the sexual nature of the illness and, specifically, the fact that it had begun in the gay community. at one time more, therefore, gay men were accused of leading a hedonistic lifestyle the lack of the practice of safe sex being the starting point for the dissemination of the disease. The AIDS epidemic also served to re-ignite traditional Christian doctrine that was and remains vehemently opposed to the legalisation and democratisation of homosexuality. Hard-line Christian activists even went so far as to claim that the AIDS virus was Gods punishment to all society for allowing gay people the right to practice their sordid sexuality in mainstream culture. The combined effect of this hysteria served to make the 1980s as opposed to 1967 the key date in queer theory in post war Britain. As Jeffrey Weeks declares, th e homophobia that was encouraged by AIDS demanded, and in fact greatly strengthened, lesbian and gay identities.With this in mind, attention must now be cancelled towards reaching a conclusion as to the significance of 1967 within the broader discussion of the democratisation of sexuality in post war Britain.That some people have decided preferences does not seem to be in head. What is now fast disappearing is the myriad of ways in which various human societies have managed to roll in the hay with the fact.As Naphy aptly suggests, the rate at which homosexuality has been integrated into mainstream culture should be judged within the much wider context of western civilisation over the past two thousand years as opposed to the forty years that have passed since the inception of the Sexual Offences Act in 1967. Ultimately, although progress concerning the democratisation of homosexuality may have met many obstacles in a variety of different guises be they legal, political, social, religious or cultural there cannot be any doubt that the gay community landscape has changed beyond all recognition in Britain since the end of the 1960s. Moreover, it would be difficult to launch an argument against 1967 being the key year within this evolution of queer theory in modern Britain as this was the date that marked the beginning of the solidification of a trans-national gay movement as well as the end of the historical marginalisation of homosexuals within the broader context of mainstream society.The fact that the fruits of this dual, spontaneous realisation did not immediately materialise in the form of a democratisation of sexuality should not be seen as a great surprise. Like the womens movement of the same era, there can be detailed doubt that the legal measures passed by parliament such as the Sex Discrimination Act served only to halt the advance of womens rights as the movement inevitably splintered on matters pertaining to race, ideology and increasingly s exuality. In this way, the lesbian order of business became increasingly divorced from the mainstream feminist agenda in the same way that the bisexual agenda has become noticeably more antagonistic towards queer theory and the homosexual community. It can be argued that this is nothing more than an inevitable by-product of a post-industrial capitalist society that has made a cultural and economic commodity of sex and sexuality to such a degree as to destabilise the solidarity of the global gay and womens movements worldwide. Thus, being a political as well as a sexual activity, homosexuality has been (and will remain) both historically and theoretically deeply influenced by the social, political and economic environment in which it is culturally defined.BibliographyBotnick, M.R. Gay Community Survival in the New Millennium. New York and capital of the United Kingdom The Haworth Press, 2000.Butler, J. Gender Trouble. Hammondsworth Penguin Classics, 2006.Cohen, S. Folk Devils and example Panics. London Paladin, 1973.Cromwell, J. Transmen and FTMs Identities, Bodies, Genders and Sexualities. Champaign University of Illinois Press, 1999Edwards, T. Queer Fears Against the Cultural Turn. Journal of Sexualities. Vol. 1, No.4, 2004.Eisenstein, H. Contemporary Feminist Thought. London Unwin, 1984.Fausto-Sterling, A. The Five Sexes Why Male and Female are not Enough. Kimmel, M.S. (Ed.) Sexualities Identities, Behaviours and Society. Oxford and New York Oxford University Press, 2004.Gauntlett, D. Media, Gender and Identity an Introduction. London Routledge, 2002.Hall, L.A. Sex, Gender and Social Change in Britain since 1880. London Macmillan, 2000.Kimmel, M.S. (Ed.) Sexualities Identities, Behaviours and Society. Oxford and New York Oxford University Press, 2004Naphy, W. Born to be Gay a History of Homosexuality. London Tempus, 2004.Pateman, C. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge Polity Press, 1988.Spargo, T. Foucault and Queer Theory. London Icon, 1999.Storr, M. Post-mod ern Bisexuality. Weeks, J., Holland, J. and Waites, M. (Eds.) Sexualities and Society A Reader. Cambridge Polity Press, 2002.Weedon, C. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford and New York Blackwell, 1987.Weeks, J. Necessary Fictions Sexual Identities and the Politics of Diversity. Weeks, J., Holland, J. and Waites, M. (Eds.) Sexualities and Society A Reader Cambridge Polity Press, 2002.Weeks, J. Coming Out. London Quartet Books, 1977.Weeks, J. Sexuality and its Discontents Meaning, Myths and Modern Sexualities. London Routledge, 1995.Homosexualities in Post War BritainThe Democratisation of Gender after the Sexual Offences Act (1967) and How It Affects Queer StudiesCore CourseGender and Society in Britain and Europe, c.1500 to the Present

Essay --

After collecting the data from three different people with different personalities and goals in life, I began to determine the strengths of to each one individual and see if the data correlated to each of their lives. Person A is currently in college studying mathematics, with an emphasis in actuary studies. The data that I collected from him represents his interest in mathematics well, and also shows his understanding of himself. It was interesting to note that although his specialty is in mathematics, his weakness is in his spatial skills. Person B has acquired an associates degree in culinary arts, and is now employed as a chef at a major hotel. The data collected from him shows that his strongest kinsfolk was his intrapersonal skills. His weakest intelligence is his musical skills. Person C is currently attending university to acquire a degree in graphic design. It was interesting to me to see that her strongest intelligence was in her naturalist skills, considering her love fo r graphic design. I would lose thought that her strongest intelligence would be in spatial skills. Her weakest intelligence was in bodily-kinesthetic skills. As for my data, I consume determined that my strongest intelligence is my interpersonal skills, which I believe to be accurate, considering my interest in speech-language pathology. I will need to have good people skills in order to excel in that field. I did find it interesting, however, that my weakest intelligence was in my spatial skills. Although, I suppose it is accurate, considering I do my best puddle when I have physical directions or information in my possession, rather than creating my own. I have found it very interesting that each of us scored highly in the intrapersonal skills section of the ... ...t they will just start playing with him and he wont have to do much talking after that. But the tranquilize kid who sits in the corner doesnt often get invited to play. Teach your child some social scripts that h e can use to initiate those interactions with other kids, such as Hi, Im Nxx, whats your name? or Can I play?Considering that each of the three people that I have interviewed and I have good interpersonal skills, it should not be too difficult to communicate effectively. One way that I think I could definitely get everyone to get along would be to divide up activities. For example, in the morning, we would work on spatial skills for client A, while in the afternoon we would work on musical skills for client B. Then the last activity for the day could be working on bodily-kinesthetic skills for client C. This way, each individual is getting their turn.

Male Dominance in The Yellow Wallpaper :: Yellow Wallpaper essays

Male Dominance in The Yellow wallpaper The story of The Yellow Wallpaper reflects the period where mendominated women. The real meaning of this story is writtenhidden behind it. The author had used a writing style that is victoriousobjects portraying men, women, and society. The story first starts off a couple have move to a house. A so-called haunted house, her wife describes it. The wife, who is a patient ofher husband, has moved here to cure her sickness. She does not admit thatshe has a problem. Everyday she keeps looking at the tore yellow wallpaper. She finds it really interesting observing it. She likes writingpersonally. And so she writes about the yellow wallpaper. Everyday shewould find something new to write about. The wallpaper really represents the society. Those bars, which shesees in front of the wallpaper, represent freedom. It is the boundary thatwoman wants to break forthright of. Women image behind the bars, tries toescaped from the control of men will eventua lly be twisted up. The lightsthat shined through the window present the dominant of men. The wifeobserves that patterns of the separate where lights shine right at it is thenon-active parts. It symbolizes women are more settle when men arewatching over them. Under their pressure, they dont dare to rebel againstthem. Her wife sees images touching around on the dark side. That brings upa big contradicting point comparing this to our present society. Back then,woman does not have much freedom. They are under mans hands. Secretlythey tired to struggle through this strangle. But they failed after all. My favorite passage of this story is on page 163. The detaileddescription that the wife describes really draws much attention to me. Ittalks about some details that the wife finds looking at the wallpaper. Andone interesting point, that she sees John and Jennie put their look on thewallpaper too. That she was surprise John and Jennie may see there issomething going on about the wallpaper . But I dont know if that is whatthe wife is determines or have a guess thats what they are doing also.Last sentence of the passage But I Know she was studying that pattern,and I am determined that aught shall find it out but myself She wasvery into examining the wallpaper, she is full of confidant that she shallbe the one finding out whats behind the wallpaper. It is quite freaky tohear that from her. Because she is a patient, and now here she is